I tried getting people interested in it a few years ago, but no one cared and continued to use shit PW managers that could easily be compromised (and then WERE compromised) with the guessing of the master password or an online data exfil dump. If you forget the master password(s), you are out of luck. one for social networks, one for work etc. You can use different password fof different sites, i.e. There is no master password, unless you just want to use one.It lets the user change the generated passwords easily by changing a seed value.It is generated at first startup and used from there on. It use a localseed that makes everyones set of passwords unique even if the same data is entered.It uses sendkeys instead of copy/paste to insert the password in the password field, bypassing the paste prevention mechanism some sites have.It can also remote special characters, also remembers that for each site.It can cut down the length, and remember the setting for each site if the pw length was limited.It does not stores any passwords, it only stores the entropy to generate passwords = bye bye offline bruteforce attacks.īy default it generate secure passwords + special characters inserted using a prng, for a total of 32 characters, however because of reality of incompetent web coders and stupid password policies, the following features have been added to it: Made a generative PW manger that addressed all these things: “no one has prevented humans from using password managers, or passphrase managers”Įxcept every odd and so website preventing the use of pasting passwords, requiring the user to type the damn password. “Encourage” is a more suitable verb, as no one has prevented humans from using password managers, or passphrase managers.This could be a good dissertation topic in applied math or something… Treat the topic from a probabilistic perspective and make the calculations! One day, I will if no one in the academia is willing to treat this matter. To reach a conclusion without the supporting evidence is just claims supported by heuristic arguments hardly a convincing claim. I still have not seen a scientific objective research in this area that concludes changing a password on a periodic basis is superior to leaving the password unchanged.The part about changing passwords when there are indications of pw compromise is sensible, assuming our detection of compromise methods are good.change their passwords unless there’s indication of compromise. Then prepare to handle passwords like: password120000.Stop it with the annoying password complexity rules:.The threat model that rotating passwords protects against has gotten very convoluted, so we’re better off without.īesides which, some people (due to techphobia or paranoia) still aren’t using and may never use password managers, so you have to account for that section of the user base as well. These days that time gap only happens if users reuse passwords, which (1) actually made more common, or the host itself is compromised, which password rotation doesn’t solve. Periodic rotation of passwords might have been useful in the days when attacks most likely had an in-person component and it was possible that there could be a significant time lapse between when the adversary learned your password and was actually able to exploit it. Much better if the manager can just spit out 16 or 20 characters of ASCII-printable noise, especially since we now know that these rules tend to cause humans to generate bad passwords rather than good ones. So, yeah, this isn't a problem you can afford to ignore.Octo8:02 problem with complexity rules isn’t just that they’re annoying for humans: if you use a password manager to generate your passwords, it doesn’t know the stupid, finicky rules required by the host. According to a 2017 survey from password manager Keeper, more than 80 percent of people over 18 admit to having the same password for more than one account. It's a bad habit, but we're almost all guilty. Spare us the theatrics of protesting that you don't reuse log-in information. It's suggesting you also change your password on all sites where you used your Twitter password. And though the social media company swears it has "no reason to believe password information ever left Twitter’s systems or was misused by anyone," it's recommending that all 336 million users change their passwords immediately.īut here's the kicker: Twitter isn't just saying you should update your password on Twitter. Twitter's chief technology officer, Parag Agrawal, revealed in a Thursday blog post that a bug in its system caused people's passwords to be kept unmasked in an internal log. But this time, you really need to take immediate action. Another day, another online security scandal - it now just seems like a natural part of life in 2018.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |